Archive of posts filed under the Baby Killers category.

Brain-Dead Pelosi: Unemployment Checks Best Way to Create Jobs

Brain-Dead Nancy Pelosi seems to feel that the government handing out unemployment checks is the fastest way to create jobs.

“It creates jobs faster than almost any other initiative you can name.”

Boycott Seattle
Boycott San Francisco
Boycott San Mateo
Boycott Denver Colorado
Remove Charlie Crist, Support Marco Rubio
Remove Ultra-Corrupt Charlie Rangel
Fire Nancy Pelosi
usbacklash.org

VN:F [1.8.7_1070]
Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  • Share/Bookmark

Crazy Violent Liberals Threaten Life Of U.S. District Court Judge

It’s laughable when we hear liberals say that conservatives are racist and violent, when all racism, violence, and violent threats have come from the left.

U.S. District Court Judge Martin Feldman is receiving death threats from the left for overturning the Obama Administration’s moratorium, and protecting the jobs of thousands of people and the livelihood of their families. Judge Feldman stated that the Obama Administration’s moratorium was misguided and overreaching, and that there was no “rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.”

“If some drilling equipment parts are flawed, is it rational to say all are? Are all airplanes a danger because one was? All oil tankers like Exxon Valdez? All trains? All mines? That sort of thinking seems heavy-handed, and rather overbearing,” – U.S. District Court Judge Martin Feldman

While many Americans undoubtedly agree with the decision of U.S. District Court Judge Martin Feldman to overturn the Obama administration’s moratorium on deep water drilling, not everyone is happy. In fact, the Judge is now receiving death threats in the aftermath of his bold ruling. Last night, Feldman served as a celebrity judge at a cooking contest at a school gymnasium in Uptown New Orleans. Due to the threats, Feldman was accompanied by a federal marshal security team.

It is a sad indictment of our society today that a judge with such a sterling record of integrity and service to his country would be subject to such threats. Feldman was appointed to the federal bench by President Reagan in 1983. Today, he is in the eye of a political hurricane unlike anything he has ever experienced.

In issuing his ruling, Feldman said that the moratorium was faulty because there was no “rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.” While there is often debate about the merits of judicial decisions, seldom does the criticism focus on the integrity of the judge. Right after he issued the ruling, Feldman came under attack as a tool of the oil industry. Media outlets reporters noted that the Judge held stock in oil and gas companies and implied that his decision was based on his own personal financial considerations. Such a personal attack is unfair and completely unwarranted, especially for Feldman, a distinguished judge known for his commitment to the law and a jurist who has earned the praise of people throughout the legal community.

Much of the sensational reporting on Feldman’s investments was based on outdated information. The Judge was blasted for owning stock in Transocean, Ltd and Halliburton, two of the major companies involved in the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Feldman owned those stocks in 2008; however, he sold those shares long before issuing his ruling this week. In fact, this updated information will be released in the next report on his stock holdings.

If Feldman held financial interests in any of companies involved in the lawsuit or the Deepwater Horizon rig, he would not have been allowed the take the case. The 5th District Court uses a sophisticated computer system to check whether judges have a conflict of interest in any legal proceeding. This system automatically determines whether a judge needs to be recused from a particular case. In this lawsuit, Feldman was allowed to take the case because he did not own any stock related to the parties involved.

The attack was not based on facts, but it was a character assassination as a way to mitigate the influence of the scathing decision. If anyone should be questioned, it is the Interior Secretary Ken Salazar who disregarded the advice of his own scientific experts in declaring the deep water drilling moratorium. In the wake of the Judge’s ruling, Salazar said he would issue a “refined” moratorium, ask for a stay of the ruling and appeal the decision. Some legal experts predicted the preliminary injunction would lead the government to compromise on the moratorium. In fact, Salazar decided to be confrontational instead of working with business interests in Louisiana to find common ground.

The lawsuit was filed against the Department of Interior by more than a dozen companies involved in offshore drilling operations, led by Hornbeck Offshore Services LLC. Feldman found that the Obama administration did not base the moratorium on solid facts and made a sweeping decision that was not justified. The Judge noted that just because the BP well was beset with problems and resulted in a massive oil spill, there is no reason to believe other wells would have similar problems. “If some drilling equipment parts are flawed, is it rational to say all are? Are all airplanes a danger because one was? All oil tankers like Exxon Valdez? All trains? All mines? That sort of thinking seems heavy-handed, and rather overbearing,” Feldman wrote.

Feldman is right on target with his ruling, which is why a constant stream of people thanked him last night for his decision. The final outcome remains in doubt, but Feldman exposed the faulty reasoning that the Obama administration used in banning deepwater drilling. The suspension of drilling in the 33 wells 500 feet or more below the surface could have a major impact on Louisiana’s economy. According to some estimates, the ban could cost the state of Louisiana 50,000 jobs or more. In a horrible economy, these are good paying jobs that no state can afford to lose.

http://www.bayoubuzz.com/buzz/latest-buzz/10729-gulf-oil-moratorium-judge-threatened

The Obama Administration and the rest of the Democrat Culture of Corruption just want to kill the oil industry to appease their militant environmentalist controllers and supporters.

U.S. District Court Judge Martin Feldman is a Great American!

TELL OBAMA TO SECURE OUR BORDERS NOW!!

Boycott Seattle
Boycott San Francisco
Boycott San Mateo
Boycott Denver Colorado
Remove Charlie Crist, Support Marco Rubio
Remove Ultra-Corrupt Charlie Rangel
Fire Nancy Pelosi
usbacklash.org

VN:F [1.8.7_1070]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  • Share/Bookmark

Hillary Clinton: Obama Administration To Sue Arizona Over Immigration Law

Hillary Clinton let the cat out of the bag during an interview with an Ecuadorean television station that the ultra-corrupt Obama Administration plans to sue Arizona for doing what Obama and the federal government will not.. Protect our borders and stop illegal immigrants and terrorists from easily strolling across the border into America.

President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy, and the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act.” – Hillary Clinton

“To learn of this lawsuit through an Ecuadorean interview with the secretary of state is just outrageous! If our own government intends to sue our state to prevent illegal immigration enforcement, the least it can do is inform us before it informs the citizens of another nation.” – Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer said Thursday she’s angry over comments by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton that the Obama administration will sue the state over its new immigration law.

In a June 8 media interview in Ecuador that began circulating Thursday in the U.S., Clinton said President Barack Obama thinks the federal government should determine immigration policy and that the Justice Department “will be bringing a lawsuit against the act.”

Justice spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler on Thursday declined to say whether the department would sue and that “the department continues to review the law.”

The department has been looking at the law for weeks for possible civil rights violations, with an eye toward a possible court challenge.

It’s unclear why Clinton made the comment since it’s not her area. She couldn’t be reached Thursday for comment.

State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said Obama and Clinton have both made it clear that the administration opposes the law.

“I will defer to the Justice Department on the legal steps that are available and where they stand on the review of the law,” Crowley said. “The secretary believes that comprehensive immigration reform is a better course of action.”

Brewer, a Republican, said in a statement that “this is no way to treat the people of Arizona.”

“To learn of this lawsuit through an Ecuadorean interview with the secretary of state is just outrageous,” she said. “If our own government intends to sue our state to prevent illegal immigration enforcement, the least it can do is inform us before it informs the citizens of another nation.”

Brewer spokesman Paul Senseman said the governor was “outraged” and that Clinton’s comments make it appear that the Justice Department has decided to file suit.

“But she’s confident that in the end, the state of Arizona, the citizens, will prevail,” he said.

On April 23, Brewer signed what is considered the toughest legislation in the nation targeting illegal immigrants. It is set to go into effect July 29 pending multiple legal challenges and the Justice Department’s review.

The law requires police investigating another incident or crime to ask people about their immigration status if there’s a “reasonable suspicion” they’re in the country illegally. It also makes being in Arizona illegally a misdemeanor, and it prohibits seeking day-labor work along the state’s streets.

The law’s stated intention is to drive illegal immigrants out of Arizona and discourage them from coming in the first place. It has outraged civil rights groups, drawn criticism from Obama and led to marches and protests organized by people on both sides of the issue.

The law’s backers say Congress isn’t doing anything meaningful about illegal immigration, so it’s the state’s duty to address the issue. Critics say it will lead to racial profiling and discrimination against Hispanics, and damage ties between police and minority communities.

Brewer met with Obama in the Oval Office about the law on June 3, telling him: “We want our border secured.” Obama reiterated his objections to the law. Neither side appeared to give ground although both talked about seeking a bipartisan solution.

Other Arizona politicians, political candidates and activist groups were quick to weigh in on Clinton’s remarks. U.S. Senate candidate J.D. Hayworth, who is challenging Sen. John McCain, called them appalling; attorney general candidates Tom Horne and Andrew Thomas also denounced them.

Joanne Lin, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, urged the administration to take swift action against the law.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100618/ap_on_re_us/us_immigration_law_clinton

I wonder though is this really a slip up by Hillary Clinton, or was this specifically designed by the liberal Obama think tank to take the heat off Obama for his completely inept handling of the BP Oil Spill Disaster?

TELL OBAMA TO SECURE OUR BORDERS NOW!!

Boycott Seattle
Boycott San Francisco
Boycott San Mateo
Boycott Denver Colorado
Remove Charlie Crist, Support Marco Rubio
Remove Ultra-Corrupt Charlie Rangel
Fire Nancy Pelosi
usbacklash.org

VN:F [1.8.7_1070]
Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)
  • Share/Bookmark