More ultra-corrupt Obama Administration Officials admit that they have not read the new Arizona Immigration Law that they have all been out attacking. Why can’t these corrupt jackasses read the fricking law before they attack it, or threaten lawsuits to stop it?
It sounds to me like the Democrats are perfectly fine with our country being attacked again and again, and under Janet Napolitano and the Obama Administration’s watchful eye, we have been attacked 3 times in one year!
Janet Napolitano admits she hasn’t read the Arizona Law!
Janet Napolitano has no business in the position of Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security when she can not or will not do anything to stop the flood of illegal immigrants invading our country on a daily basis. If someone can carry a bottle of water over our borders, then they can also carry a dirty bomb, or some kind of biological weapon that could make a city unlivable for hundreds of years.
State Department Spokesman PJ Crowley admits he hasn’t read the Arizona Law!
“This is how we function under the rule of law” Really??
If the corrupt Obama Administration functioned under the rule of law, they would be protecting our borders from the illegal invasions of our country that are continually happening every day of the year.
The Obama Administration, who brag about being the most transparent Administration in history, are in panic mode trying to cover up all of Mr. Obama’s many failures.
This is actually the most covert and corrupt Administration in history, not the other way around.
In the days after an oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, the White House faced not only a looming environmental catastrophe, but also a potential public relations disaster.
Aides feared that a story line would take hold that President Barack Obama had responded too slowly to the spreading oil slick, which could damage him politically much as the slow federal response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005 discredited former President George W. Bush.
So as the federal government began reacting to the spreading oil, the White House message machine swung into action, too.
Within hours, it was cranking out a sustained barrage across the broad spectrum of modern media — statements, reports, e-mails, tweets, photos and videos — all punctuated by a high-profile presidential visit to the Gulf followed by an incendiary speech at the White House and a video recap with exclusive behind-the-scenes views of Obama in “West Wing Week,” the White House’s new online program at www.whitehouse.gov.
Whether it’s Obama sitting with one reporter or a statement sent via Twitter, nothing happens by accident. The White House message machinery is a crucial element of the ever-expanding presidency, and like his recent predecessors, Obama uses it to shape public opinion, drive the mainstream media’s agenda and minimize political blowback.
The White House bureaucracy devoted to managing public imagery has been growing since President Richard Nixon created the first office devoted to broad communications strategy in 1969. Obama’s version uses a blend of old and new techniques and technology in an effort to cut through a polarized partisan landscape and a dizzying array of modern mass media that abbreviate attention spans and fracture public attention.
Obama’s White House message machine employs 69 people who are directly involved in some part of the communications effort, at a cost to taxpayers of at least $4.3 million a year. That’s an increase from 47 in Bill Clinton’s White House and 52 in George W. Bush’s.
Those totals don’t include communications staffs at the National Security Council or in Vice President Joseph Biden’s offices, or support staff who are paid out of different accounts.
They also don’t include hundreds of political appointees scattered across cabinet departments and agencies who were hired with approval from the Obama White House and who work with the White House to present a coordinated message, as they did under previous presidents
The Obama Administration even produces their own “news interviews” with government staffers and others who are sympathetic to the Administration’s wishes and needs.
I believe the Bush Administration put out one or two self-produced videos, and they were attacked for it. Where is the outrage against this socialist President who releases a new self-produced cover-up video every day or two?
Obama and the Democrats have started imposing the changes on us to try and bring about Maurice StrongGeorge Soros, and Joel Rogers’ vision for “Global Governance” and new world order, which involves controlling the world’s population and economies by controlling and taxing the environmental impact of everything we do or use.
Obama’s Cap and Trade bill, now re-branded as the “American Power Act”, plays right into their global governance plan, which would establish a carbon cap that aims to reduce U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions to 17% below 2005 levels by 2020, and 80% below those levels by midcentury.
Their plan will completely destroy our economy and our entire capitalist system. According to their man, even if we completely shut down our economy and stopped all cars and transportation, we would still never even come close to their goal of 80 percent below 2005 levels.
“You could do everything in the US to eliminate greenhouse gasses and it wont make much of a dent actually.. I hope you all realize that you could eliminate every power plant in America today, and you could stop every car in America, take out the entire power generation sector, take out all of the transportation sector, and you still wouldn’t be anywhere near 80 percent below 1990 levels.. You’d be closer to 60 percent.. you’d be right around 68 percent, and that’s bringing the economy to a complete halt, basically.” – Joel Rogers
Maurice Strong Quotes
“This interlocking…is the new reality of the century, with profound implications for the shape of our institutions of governance, national and international. By the year 2012, these changes must be fully integrated into our economic and political life.” - Maurice Strong
“Developed and benefited from the unsustainable patterns of production and consumption which have produced our present dilemma. It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class—involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing—are not sustainable. A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmentally damaging consumption patterns.” - Maurice Strong
“Climate change is the biggest single challenge humans have ever faced. Unlike other problems, which can be solved regionally or sectorally, climate change effects the very future of life on earth. It is the greatest security problem we have ever faced.” - Maurice Strong
..abolishing the slave trade, abolishing child labour in the UK, all these great movements really were people-driven and the politicians followed. What is now happening is that there is a huge people-centred movement that is going to force — at least support or force — depending on the situation — the politicians to do what they have to do.
“What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about?” - Maurice Strong
Strong’s response to this quote being used to show that he for “global governance”
“A particularly dishonest statement by long-time critic, Peter Foster, to his own editor, citing a fictional account which was clearly stated to be an extreme scenario of what might happen by the year 2030 if we failed to act. This specifically stated that it was not a prediction, and certainly not a recommendation, but the kind of prospect we must seek to avoid.”- Maurice Strong
REMOVE USELESS FRAUD ERIC HOLDER! Eric Holder spent days attacking the new Arizona Immigration Law, but he did not even read the bill before attacking it, which shows that the Obama Administration's objections to the law are political.
Just weeks after the latest New York terrorist attack, the Obama Administration slashed NY Anti-Terrorism Funding by about $53 Million.
Funny that Mitch McConnell--who took Obama "at his word" about being a Christian- hopes O turns into a "born-again" moderate after m-terms?about 22 hours agofrom web
Hello, Cleveland?... Obama calls Ohio "the great state of Illinois" -- Rahm on the brain?06:08:47 PM September 08, 2010from web