President George W. Bush protected The United States from terrorist attacks for over 7 years, while under Obama we have been attacked at least 3 times in under one year. Just goes to show that Democrats have no clue how to protect our country.
Mr. Obama and the Democrats are all starting to whine and cry about the criticism their party is starting receive for all of their idiotic, ill-conceived, and possibly illegal actions and policies. The Democrats have really screwed themselves in the next election, and probably for years to come, but they only have Obama and their own party to blame.
Funny how things are coming back full circle to bite the butts of the Democrats who started all of the partisan political problems that our country faces today.
Democrats, in their true hypocritical fashion, tried to make it seem that Bush was the only one who thought that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, when in reality many world leaders and most Democrats publicly stated that Saddam had WMD, was a threat to the stability of the region, and a danger to the world.
It was only after the early days of the Iraq war, when no WMD were found, that the Democrats started trying to whitewash and re-write history to falsely accuse President Bush of being an evil tyrant who invaded a country for oil, while absolving themselves from any of the blame.
Seven years ago today, in a speech on the Iraq war, Sen. Ted Kennedy fired the first shot in an all-out assault on President George W. Bush’s integrity. “All the evidence points to the conclusion,” Kennedy said, that the Bush administration “put a spin on the intelligence and a spin on the truth.” Later that day Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle told reporters Mr. Bush needed “to be forthcoming” about the absence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
Thus began a shameful episode in our political life whose poisonous fruits are still with us.
The next morning, Democratic presidential candidates John Kerry and John Edwards joined in. Sen. Kerry said, “It is time for a president who will face the truth and tell the truth.” Mr. Edwards chimed in, “The administration has a problem with the truth.”
The battering would continue, and it was a monument to hypocrisy and cynicism. All these Democrats had said, like Mr. Bush did, that Saddam Hussein possessed WMD. Of the 110 House and Senate Democrats who voted in October 2002 to authorize the use of force against his regime, 67 said in congressional debate that Saddam had these weapons. This didn’t keep Democrats from later alleging something they knew was false—that the president had lied America into war.
Senate Intelligence Chairman Bob Graham organized a bipartisan letter in December 2001 warning Mr. Bush that Saddam’s “biological, chemical and nuclear weapons programs . . . may be back to pre-Gulf War status,” and enhanced by “longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.” Yet two years later, he called for Mr. Bush’s impeachment for having said Saddam had WMD.
On July 9, 2004, Mr. Graham’s fellow Democrat on Senate Intelligence, Jay Rockefeller, charged that the Bush administration “at all levels . . . used bad information to bolster the case for war.” But in his remarks on Oct. 10, 2002, supporting the war resolution, he said that “Saddam’s existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose real threats to America.”
Even Kennedy, who opposed the war resolution, nonetheless said the month before the vote that Saddam’s “pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated.” But he warned if force were employed, the Iraqi dictator “may decide he has nothing to lose by using weapons of mass destruction himself or by sharing them with terrorists.”
Then there was Al Gore, who charged on June 24, 2004, that Mr. Bush spent “prodigious amounts of energy convincing people of lies” and accused him of treason, bellowing that Mr. Bush “betrayed his country.” Yet just a month before the war resolution debate, the former vice president said, “We know that [Saddam] has stored away secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”
Top Democrats led their party in making the “Bush lied, people died” charge because they wanted to defeat him in 2004. That didn’t happen. Several bipartisan commissions would later catalogue the serious errors in the intelligence on which Mr. Bush and Democrats relied. But these commissions, particularly the Silberman-Robb report of March 31, 2005, found that the “Bush lied” charge was false. Still, the attacks hurt: When they began, less than a third of Americans believed the charge. Two years later, polls showed that just over half did.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704518904575365793062101552.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories
So cry all you want, wussy Democrats. You’re getting a taste of what you deserve, and many of you will be jobless in a few months, undoubtedly making this next election even more sweet.
TELL OBAMA TO SECURE OUR BORDERS NOW!!
Boycott Seattle
Boycott San Francisco
Boycott San Mateo
Boycott Denver Colorado
Remove Charlie Crist, Support Marco Rubio
Remove Ultra-Corrupt Charlie Rangel
Fire Nancy Pelosi
usbacklash.org
Loading ...